In law, a “fact” is not referred to simply as a “fact,” but rather as a “ contextual fact.” The legal system addresses the relationships between people, positing that all facts are generated and understood within these relationships. Even the question of existence—whether to be or not to be—is grasped through the lens of relationships. There is no fact without a relationship, and the fact itself is neither true nor false; instead, the relationship determines its truthfulness or falsity. In other words, if you view truth and falsehood as absolute, you will navigate the world with a rigid mindset. Conversely, if you accept them as relative and contextual, you will perceive them with a broader sense of liberty. Ultimately, which perspective leads to greater happiness is a matter of individual disposition and taste. - Joseph’s “just my thoughts”
A cook’s genuine passion for food reflects the value and quality of their creations. Even when the taste is terrible, the cook’s heartfelt effort might still elicit a belief that the food is healthy. Traditionally, this might have made sense, but from a scientific standpoint, it is absurd. Despite knowing proven cooking methods, many chefs continue to rely on their instincts, often without questioning their approaches. Few chefs actually consider the trustworthy resource of food quality, fearing that acknowledging this might label them as inferior chefs.
- Joseph’s “just my thoughts”
Comments
Post a Comment